Comments on: New UK Job Search Engine JobDaddy http://www.altsearchengines.com/2009/01/13/new-uk-job-search-engine-jobdaddy/ The most wonderful search engines you've never seen! Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:10:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Tom http://www.altsearchengines.com/2009/01/13/new-uk-job-search-engine-jobdaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-114003 Tom Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:24:29 +0000 http://www.altsearchengines.com/?p=4003#comment-114003 looks nice & simply. hope jobdaddy.co.uk works for job seekers. looks nice & simply. hope jobdaddy.co.uk works for job seekers.

]]> By: jose http://www.altsearchengines.com/2009/01/13/new-uk-job-search-engine-jobdaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-113556 jose Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:06:57 +0000 http://www.altsearchengines.com/?p=4003#comment-113556 Search and retrieval gets a remake every few years. Text mining and discovery tools surged with injections of U.S. Government money when budgets for human analysts were slashed. After 9-11, technology that had languished in the shadows took center stage. Key word retrieval is useful for certain types of research. Laundry lists of results required a human to sift through them. Natural language processing, the Semantic Web, LSI (latent semantic indexing), and predictive analytics offered what key word retrieval could not—provide an overview, allow point-and-click discovery, and identification of the nuggets of information needed to answer a question or solve a problem. Social search in all its many forms can be quite useful. It allows individuals to identify a particular source that struck a person as useful. If several people identify that source as valuable, the “collective intelligence” of the users has filtered the wheat from the chaff. Instead of being the solution, social search is one more technique in information retrieval. Placing too much or too little emphasis on it is risky. Like other search techniques, social search can be useful. Social search does have a downside because several people acting in concert can distort the system. Examples of this may be found on Digg.com, Reddit.com, and Delicious.com every day. =============================================== jose <a href="http://www.getthatjobuk.com" rel="nofollow">get that job uk</a> Search and retrieval gets a remake every few years. Text mining and discovery tools surged with injections of U.S. Government money when budgets for human analysts were slashed. After 9-11, technology that had languished in the shadows took center stage. Key word retrieval is useful for certain types of research. Laundry lists of results required a human to sift through them. Natural language processing, the Semantic Web, LSI (latent semantic indexing), and predictive analytics offered what key word retrieval could not—provide an overview, allow point-and-click discovery, and identification of the nuggets of information needed to answer a question or solve a problem.

Social search in all its many forms can be quite useful. It allows individuals to identify a particular source that struck a person as useful. If several people identify that source as valuable, the “collective intelligence” of the users has filtered the wheat from the chaff. Instead of being the solution, social search is one more technique in information retrieval.

Placing too much or too little emphasis on it is risky. Like other search techniques, social search can be useful. Social search does have a downside because several people acting in concert can distort the system. Examples of this may be found on Digg.com, Reddit.com, and Delicious.com every day.

===============================================
jose

get that job uk

]]> By: Jack http://www.altsearchengines.com/2009/01/13/new-uk-job-search-engine-jobdaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-112460 Jack Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:19:51 +0000 http://www.altsearchengines.com/?p=4003#comment-112460 Kool name!! Kool name!!

]]>