StreetEasy NYC, featuring StreetSearch

December 17th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Local, Verticals | No Comments »

StreetEasy was born out of the frustration we experienced when we set out to buy an apartment in New York. Not only did we have to check multiple sites, but also we could never search by the things most important to us (like by school) or get information that was important to us (like the real deal on a condo or co-op board).

So instead of complaining, we are turning the complex, frustrating process of shopping for homes in New York City into an experience that will be fun, informative, collaborative and easy. We are adding all sorts of information for home shoppers, like…public school information, market data, stats and trends, details about neighbors and neighborhoods, building and neighborhood photos, and more. We call all this StreetInfo, and it’s really meant to make us all more informed.

Great neighborhoods and good neighbors come from open dialogue and access to information. So we invite you, our community (shoppers, sellers, brokers, etc.) to discuss all the things related to your neighborhood and real estate. Log in and share your opinions about specific homes, neighborhoods, pricing trends, mortgage rates, or your co-op/condo board. We call these discussion boards StreetTalk. The goal is an honest and open dialogue about everything related to New York City residential real estate. So, please, speak up!

We’re also making searching for homes much easier. Sure, you can search by price, region or number of bedrooms, like many real estate sites. And at StreetEasy, you can also search by neighborhood, building, zoned school area. You can also save these searches and have us send you an alert any time there is new information. We call these new ways of searching, StreetSearch. Source: StreetEasy

Alt Search Engines Gain Market Share – Not!

December 17th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Alts, News, Top 100 | No Comments »

Google accounted for 71.97% of all US searches in the four weeks ending Nov. 29, 2008, while Yahoo Search, MSN Search and Ask received 17.70%, 5.45% and 3.35%, respectively, according to data from Hitwise. Source: Hitwise

November 2007 -to- November 2008:

*Yahoo! down from 21.62% to 17.70%

*MSN was down from 9.80% to 5.45%

*Ask.com down from 3.72% to 3.35%

*Search engines from 1.71% to 1.53%

*The remaining 43 search engines together accounted for 1.53% of US searches.

*November was the fourth straight month that MSN/Live Search increased its search share.

Mobile Search Taptu Secures Series B Funding

December 17th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Mobile, News, Verticals | No Comments »

Taptu, the pure-play mobile search engine, has secured £6.45m in series B funding from its existing investors 3i and Sofinnova investments and has appointed Andreas Bernstrom to the position of Chief Operating Officer (COO). Andreas will be part of Taptu’s senior management team, responsible for managing the company’s commercial growth and formalising Taptu’s mobile advertising position, worldwide.


The funding was secured in recognition of the success that Taptu has already achieved both here and in the United States, and to accelerate Taptu’s continued growth over the next 12 months.

Steve Ives, CEO and founder of Taptu, said: “Taptu has had a stellar year, having won numerous awards including Best Mobile Search provider 2008 at the MEA awards and now achieving Series B funding from our investors, it’s great timing to bring Andreas on Board.  He brings with him valuable experience that will help us drive Taptu forward as a business and will play an important part in developing our business presence overseas as well as maintaining momentum in the UK.”

Search for CME – continuing medical education

December 17th, 2008 by Hope Leman
Posted in Health, Reviews, Verticals | 3 Comments »

Attention physicians, medical office staff and medical librarians. Here is a useful new online resource for finding continuing medical education courses. CME Click is neither perfect nor very pretty, but it is a handy tool when a procrastinating physician (or a highly efficient one who has only just been informed about a new mandate) needs to meet a CME requirement as quickly as possible.

Medical librarians and administrative staff in hospitals and other medical settings are often asked to help busy physicians find courses that will enable the latter to meet continuing medical education requirements. These requirements are crucial to matters of licensing and vary widely by specialty by state and medical specialty. The poor office and library staff often do not possess expertise in this field. Consequently, they find themselves frantically but unavailingly thumbing through catalogs (and lamenting the fact that they had only just discarded stacks of such things) of the many for-profit companies and of medical societies and professional associations that deal in this lucrative arena. Pity the bewildered medical office manager trying to determine if some events meet ethical standards (such as those offered by pharmaceutical companies). What doctors and their harried staff need is a free online directory of CME opportunities.

Well, here is a new service to check out:  CME Click. According to its press release:

“…Medical professionals can search multiple formats – online, conference, lecture, seminar, publication, audio-, video-, and computer-based – by specialty and location (of) courses..”

So is it good? It is serviceable. The interface is nondescript and there are typos that don’t exactly instill confidence in a first-time user that this is a state-of-the-art tool for today’s medical professional. (Example of typo, “Secialty checklist that will filter results based on your selection…”)

There don’t seem to be any RSS feeds or details about what the email newsletter might consist of and forget about a screencast showcasing the merits of the service. From a Web design standpoint CME Click is circa 1999.

But if you are in need of handy compendium of CME opportunities, CME Click is okay and okay is pretty good considering what a hassle it can be to find CME courses. You can search by date and there is a fairly broad range of specialties (e.g., Adolescent Medicine, Allergy & Immunology, Internal Medicine, Perinatology, Medical Genetics). It is open to partnering opportunities with organizations hosting and listing CME courses (though hospitals and other medical institutions and medical libraries with Web sites would probably be better off just purchasing data from CME Click and designing their own pages or just linking to it).

There are also internal consistency problems. For instance, it says on one page, “CME Cick [note that the name of the company is misspelled] does not accept advertising to ensure there is no conflict of interest. Your organization can feel comfortable placing your CME on the site knowing that advertising by pharmaceutical companies is restricted…” and on another, “Reach medical professionals with your targeted message. Advertising on CME Click offers targeted spots based on keyword searches. Your message will reach the right professional, in the right specialty…” I guess that means drug companies no, everybody else more or less yes.

The major selling point of CME Click is that is provides links to the actual Web sites detailing the CME opportunities. That feature does a great deal to put the clunkiness of the rest of the site in perspective. CME Click would save medical people looking for CMEs time. Although, actually, not all that much time would be saved given that the dates of courses are not given on the All Courses page. I clicked on such things as Advances in Psychiatry and A Clinical Update on Intrauterine Contraception only to find that those courses had been held some weeks back. Lots of fruitless clicking then in a tool that is supposed to streamline the process of finding CME courses. True, there is value in being able to learn that such and such a course was offered at one point and what entity offered it. But the potential users of this service are far more likely to want to know what they can get their patrons signed up for now, not what they could have attended had they known about it.

This is a good idea that just needs Web design and search engine interface know-how help.

Now, if a firm like Deep Web Technologies or Niche Tank were to redesign this site, it might take off. It’s a nice little niche player.