iMedix and Trusera – The Psoriasis Test Case

June 15th, 2008 by Rafi Farber
Posted in Reviews, Verticals | 2 Comments »

I have a friend whose hair started falling out suddenly, and her scalp started looking scaly. The doctor said it was psoriasis, and she came home with two types of shampoo, some drops and an ointment that she has to smush in her hair for a very long time.

I’ve heard of psoriasis before and I remembered it not being that serious, but I tend not to trust anything with a silent p since silent p’s scare me. That, and all that shampoo and ointment seemed excessive and very goopy. Was there anything else to do?

Today I talked with Iri Amirav, founder and CMO of iMedix, a new health alternative search engine based in Israel with a two-pronged approach to healthcare.

First, iMedix offers pre-approved articles on almost any disease in the known world, with a fix-as-you-go spellchecker in case you don’t know about the silent p in psoriasis.

Secondly, iMedix gives you a network of people who are interested in the same disease. It’s like Facebook for diseases.

And what about Google? In comparing Googlehealth with iMedix, Amirav had this to say, “Googlehealth is a walled approach, it’s private and secure. On iMedix, we’re about openness. The philosophy that my partner and I have for healthcare is to promote transparency. Complimentary to Google, this is something that’s different but can be used at the same time. Here you can search for health information that was already filtered. Google can’t do that because everything’s private.”

And the psoriasis information I found? Other than goopy ointments, I found that you can dunk your head in the dead sea, which is good, because I live right near there.

For a summary video of the site, see below.





I did the same thing with Trusera and did a psoriasis search. Trusera does not have an on-the-fly spellchecker, so if you don’t know about the silent p, you won’t find anything.

Nonetheless, Trusera is based on the concept of sharing medical stories, also with the open approach of iMedix, but without the articles. It simply links people and allows you to share your stories about various diseases, which sounds like fun.

Its staff is composed of former Amazon executives, They claim that out of the 113 million people going online to find health information, 84% turn to online social spaces to educate themselves about a disease or a condition, so the demand for a site where people can find personally relevant health information, lean on the wisdom of the crowds and leverage the power of “been there” is growing.

Essentially, iMedix is Trusera with articles, but Trusera has more personalized stories. Both will get you connected to the diseased community you seek. Or better yet, the recently healed community you seek to learn from.

Search 3.0 – Sullivan style

June 15th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Reviews | No Comments »

A few days ago I sketched out my definition of Search 3.0.

It went like this:

Search 1.0 = a linear set of results, like Google’s.

Search 2.0 = 2-D results, like a map or tag cloud.

Search 3.0 = the new 3-D “look,” like SearchMe.

Search 4.0 adds continuous updating, or “time.”

Well, over at Search Engine Land, Danny Sullivan revealed his scheme for Search 3.0. NOTE: To participate in this on-going discussion of Search 3.0 definitions, you really must read his article in its entirety by clicking HERE.

Here is Danny Sullivan’s bare outline:

Search 1.0 (1996): Pages ranked using “on-the-page” criteria

Search 2.0 (1998): Pages ranked using “off-the-page” criteria

Search 3.0 (2007): Vertical search results blended into regular search results

Search 4.0 The Human Factor

“Overall, there’s a role for humans, a way for them to be in the search process to enhance results. Actually, there will be several ways for them to be involved. Exactly how remains to be seen, of course. Of the things I’ve outlined, personalized search, social search, human editors — I think personalized search is the one that will emerge as the major part of Search 4.0. That’s not to discount other things being tried, and they’ll contribute in some ways. But to me, personalized search has the most potential for another big relevancy leap.”

Now you have two definitions of Search 3.0 – any thoughts? In a few days I’ll show you the next one.

Feel free to share your definition of Search 1.0, etc.!

Kigose – the Citation Search Engine

June 15th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Global, Newcomers, Reviews | No Comments »



Kigose is a website designed for students and teachers to find educational resources.

Kigose only includes public websites that are for educational purposes only. Educational websites that need a subscription are excluded. They also encourage each school community to respect copyright policy. Any accessed materials therefore must be cited. The list of the websites included are suggested by teachers, parents and students.

Ronald Daniar, Author and Administrator

‘This site is my first contribution in online education. I had this initiative after I gave presentation to the teachers in my school about internet safety. My research about kids search engines brought me to a point that teachers and students need more updated educational sites. Kigose has been rebuilt for many times. I had no web design background skill at all and learned everything from zero. This version is intended to be fast and bring to the exact point.”

“I am still working on Kigose to add more educational websites and also to modify the image search that does not show the result properly. In the future, I plan to include other languages so that it will be useful in many countries. The short-term plan is to add citation builder under the search box that will help students and teachers to cite online resource.”

The Sunday Geek Quiz!

June 15th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

My friend Carlos Lagemann inspired this post. He has a search engine called CompareSearch.org which allowed me to put all 188 alternative search engines in The Search Race into two columns. That way I can compare any two engines, e.g. ChaCha and Omgili, or Quintura and UpTake, and so on.

The question is, if you made every possible unique pair, how many pairs would you have?

Please leave your answer in the comments, along with your formula if you used one!

(Note: You would not count any pair such as ChaCha vs. ChaCha.) 

Blog search engine Twingly is full of surprises

June 15th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Reviews | No Comments »

Twingly is a spam-free blog search engine. Their goal is to create the first and best spam-free search engine and to be the most innovative web startup in Europe.

Twingly uses their search engine as the basis for developing fun products. Right now, the two most popular are: Twingly Blogstream – connecting traditional media to the Blogosphere – and Twingly Screensaver, a visual representation of the state of the blogosphere. You should also check out their Blog Profiles, Widget, and more features are on their way. While their eventual goal is, “nothing short of world dominance,” they are currently focusing their efforts on European blogs. Having said this, their index already includes many blogs from all over the world.

I searched for ‘Absinthe’ and got this gem: Tailor’s absinthe gummi bears get you f’ed up on wormwood so adorably. (Modern Absinthe has no thujone.)

According to this week’s UrbanDaddy NYC, absinthe gummi bears are now available alongside espresso at Tailor on the Lower East Side. From the UrbanDaddy write-up: That’s right, your favorite recently…

Download the screensaver