Search Engines Oddpath People, Travel, Money

March 30th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Alts, News, Reviews | No Comments »

Oddpath is putting itself in front of millions of people in the form of over 11,000,000 listings for everything from cafes, restaurants, parks and businesses, with additional features and tools to bring search engine data full circle.

This search presents users with the simplest and fastest interface supported by the largest database to search people in the U.S. Beta testing affirms Oddpath People Search produces more data than other people searches. Oddpath People can search for and map over 100,000,000 people in the U.S. without any charges.

A hybrid look and technology will enable global tracking of market bull and bear cycles and money worldwide. The Oddpath dynamic solution puts users in control of information, to look up data points on both equities and markets. The data is compact and customizable.

Once out of beta, Oddpath Travel will feature unusual, luxury and affluent, high-end travel at affordable, mainstream prices including private jet tours and trips, as well as helicopter rides and trips.

Why I ♥ Health Search Engine OrganizedWisdom

March 30th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Reviews | No Comments »


Before the Search panel at SES New York, I gave OrganizedWisdom a try. I searched for my eye condition, CRVO. There was no result. Thousands of Wisdom Cards and not one for me. BUT, OrganizedWisdom has a procedure for requesting a Wisdom Card, so I put in a request late in the evening at my hotel. In the morning – the next morning – there was an email from OW saying that my Wisdom Card was ready. They had created it over night!

And here it is, my wisdom card! But that’s not all. On the Wisdom Card is a link to the Health Expert who created it, Tara.

And here’s Tara! WITH contact information.

So, I emailed Tara to thank her for my Wisdom Card, and within an hour she responded.

Bottom line: If you want a Wisdom Card for your medical condition, or for your friend or family member’s, OW will either have one or make one. And if you have a question about it, you can check in with your personal Health Expert.

Honestly, can Google do that?

A Chat with OrganizedWisdom’s Unity Stoakes

March 30th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in CEO Views | 1 Comment »

AltSearchEngines Chats with Unity Stoakes, President OrganizedWisdom.com Health

Unity is a long-time advocate for helping people get better access to health information, and is a serial entrepreneur with a passion for building businesses that leverage the internet to solve important challenges. Unity first became involved with the healthcare industry with his involvement in helping companies manage HIPAA compliance. Prior to starting OrganizedWisdom Health, Unity has helped build, grow and sell several companies including, Middleberg Interactive, Promotions.com, and The Privacy Council. He is a frequent speaker and blogger on healthcare, social media and Internet trends. He received his bachelor’s degrees in Communications and Political Science from Boston University. He lives in New York City with his wife.

ASE: OrganizedWisdom Health is an innovative approach to the online search for health info. Can you please talk about what OW is and how the concept was developed/refined?

Unity Stoakes: OrganizedWisdom Health is a human-powered, doctor-guided search service for health. We have a team of expert guides and physician reviewers who create WisdomCards to help people find the best health information, products and services on the Web. We are laying the knowledge, experience, and credibility of experts on top of great technologies to guide people to health resources that will help them.

The concept for OrganizedWisdom.com was developed as a result of our own frustration with health search. A few years ago, my business partner Steven Krein was searching for very specific health information when he and his wife were trying to have their first child. After searching for many hours, they still weren’t able to find the information they needed. What they did find was a lot of clutter, random user generated content and spam Web sites that now get mixed in with all the quality resources. After discussing the problem, we realized there had to be a better way to draw on the collective wisdom of experts, health advocates and doctors, to help filter out the junk. We decided to create a service that guides people to the very best info, resources and services.

So far OrganizedWisdom.com has created WisdomCards for over 15,000 of the most popular health search terms and we plan to cover over 200,000 health topics in the next 24 months for all health topics including diseases, conditions, treatments, drugs, holistic topics, lifestyle issues, and even doctors and hospitals.

ASE: Tell us about the challenge of running a health/medical search engine. It would seem there are more legal issues when people are searching for medical info.

Unity Stoakes: The legal issues are actually not our main concern because we are very clear that we do not provide medical advice and we do recommend people see a doctor immediately if they have an important health issue. Our focus, and main priority, is on quality and credibility. Our goal is to make each WisdomCard exceptional and it must meet very strict guidelines. People often ask how we maintain all of these WisdomCards and how this model can scale. We are able to leverage great collaboration technology, and a distributed team of Guides and Experts, to make this possible. By laying human knowledge with the power of great technology and social media, these challenges become very manageable.

ASE: Was there a steep learning curve for you (re: medical information) when you founded OW?

Unity Stoakes: Many of the people on our team are doctors and health experts. We also make sure to have people working on our team who have been patient advocates and understand the needs from the perspective of people living with a disease or health issue. We do see it as an advantage that when we started the company, we were not health professionals, however, because it gave us the opportunity to think with a fresh perspective. We often meet people who have been in the health care industry for years and they are jaded, or constantly saying why something can’t be done, or how long it will take to fix. Our approach is to think about how it can be fixed — and how we can start making a difference now. We’re trying to look at it from the perspective of a real person needing care or information. We think about the way we want health search to work for us and our families.

ASE: How is searching with OW different than other search engines that provide medical information?

Unity Stoakes: No one really needs 1.4 million Web pages when you type in a health query. People want an organized set of links that guide them to the very best information and resources they can trust. People credible sites and answer their questions. Because our WisdomCards are created by health experts, we are able to filter out all of the junk, clutter, and index spam and guide people to the very best evidence based resources and even user-generated content. We have experts looking at every resource and we are the only doctor-guided search service on the Web.

ASE: What are the most popular wisdom cards/searches?

Unity Stoakes: In the past few minutes we had people search on cancer, ovarian cysts, sexually transmitted diseases, famous people who died of aids, depression, care-giving advice. There is a great variety of health topics that people are searching for and we are seeing many very “long tail” topics. The trends change each hour and very often can be impacted by cultural events, news media, the weather, the season, etc. People often have very specific health issues they are searching for and it can be difficult for them to find credible information in some areas.

ASE: What is “Live Wisdom?”

Unity Stoakes: LiveWisdom is a new service we are building into WisdomCards so people can connect LIVE via chat with board certified doctors, health professionals, and health advocates for only $1.99 per minute. We believe that asking doctors questions should be easy, affordable, and accessible to all. The service is not meant to be a doctor visit, but is meant to be an educational resource for people who may have one or two important questions. The service, still in pilot beta, is private and anonymous as well which we think will help a lot of people get information they otherwise may avoid asking.

ASE: I know that your Wisdomcards are ‘handcrafted.’ Can you please explain what that means- who crafts them? Is that different than other medical web search engines?

Unity Stoakes: Each WisdomCard features an organized set of links that have been reviewed and placed their by a an expert guide who we pay. Other health search engines either use technology algorithms to display their links or they feature licensed content from one of a few evidence-based information providers. Our expert guides are health advocates, patient experts, web researchers, nurses, health professionals, and doctors. We pay people to handcraft WisdomCards because we think that health information is too important to leave to technology alone. We believe that our service approach layered on top of great algorithms is more powerful because our trained experts can actually check each resource to make sure it is useful, credible, and worthy of inclusion on a WisdomCard.

ASE: How much marketing do you do/ what’s your target demographic?

Unity Stoakes: We don’t spend money on marketing actually. We focus all of our energy and resources on creating quality WisdomCards — our content. We are generating most of our traffic from search engines like Google, Yahoo and MSN as well as hospitals, health foundations and bloggers who link to our WisdomCards. Our target demographic is anyone seeking health information. About 80% of internet users have searched for health information so it is a very wide demographic. Originally, more women used the site, but it is getting closer to 50/50 now. And the majority of users are between the ages of 25 and 54. But you would be surprised at how many younger people are using the site.

ASE: Who inspires you in the business sector? Personally? Why?

Unity Stoakes: We are big fans of the team at 37Signals and their approach to innovation. Their book Getting Real has been like our business bible. We have learned a lot from them in trying to keep things simple and constantly working to improve our service. Personally, Richard Branson is also a big influence because he is willing to take on any challenge no matter how big — the bigger the better — and fight against the established status quo. We admire people who think big and go big — and never give up.

ASE: When I’m not working I’m….

Unity Stoakes: Hmmm… Is that a trick question? Actually, the truth is we don’t feel like what we are doing is work at all. It is a mission to us. Building OrganizedWisdom is not only fun, but it is immensely rewarding especially when people email you or tell you how much you have helped them.

ASE: Whom are you rooting for in this election?

Unity Stoakes: It is too early to tell. The health platforms have been fairly vague. And our honest belief is that it is going to be up to entrepreneurs and consumers to change health care. We don’t have time to wait for politicians anymore.

ASE: Where do you think medical/health search will be in one year?

Unity Stoakes: Many more people will realize the value of having doctor-guided search. It will be embedded into your hospitals web page, your health foundations web site, and if you have a smart doctor into their personal blog. Sound too dreamy? Not if we have anything to do about it…

ASE: Thanks so much, Unity

AltSearchEngines is looking for a sponsor for this feature. Your company’s logo, tag line, and link would appear here after every profile. Please email: Charles@ReadWriteWeb.com for more information.

Social search approaches and algorithm-based search engines in comparison

March 30th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Guest Authors | No Comments »

Dr. Christian Maaß

Original Article: Soziale Suchdienste und algorithmenbasierte Suchmaschinen im Vergleich

In recent times it is striking that search engines based on alternative approaches are entering the market increasingly. Social search approaches take over a special role within this context. They are available taking into account several characteristics and – in contrast to search engines as Google, Yahoo and Ask – involve the user when generating the index. Up to now, the scientific discussion on this topic is still in its infancy. In the context of a project in cooperation with Prof. Dr. Dirk Lewandowski we have deducted a seminar on the topic of social search approaches. Amongst others, one topic was to compare the relevancy of hits of algorithm-based search engines with social bookmarking systems and question-answer-services. In this place, I want to shortly introduce some of the results, a more detailed version of the report will appear as edited volume in some weeks from now.
To find an answer to the question in how far social search approaches can compete with Google & Co, a test on relevancy has been carried out, taking into account the following three types of search approaches:
· Google, Yahoo and MSN have been chosen as samples for algorithm-based search engines, as they are the three largest providers worldwide maintaining an own index
· The best known German-speaking and English-speaking social bookmarking systems have been included in the analysis by picking Mister Wong and del.icio.us
· Finally, the question-/answer-services LycosIQ and Yahoo! Clever have been chosen to form part of the analysis, which have to be seen as a special manifestation of social search approaches
More than 50 search inquiries have been set for each of the services listed above so that the error probability is minimized. To analyze the relevancy of results generated by algorithm-based search engines and social bookmarking systems, the first ten results are taken into consideration, the analysis of question-answer-services is based on the first three questions displayed. The results of these inquiries have been presented to a group of judges anonymously. The judges neither knew the rank of the search result nor by which search engine the hits were generated. Criteria to be taken into account were
· Precision of search results,
· Intelligibility of search results and
· Trustworthiness of search results.
Precision describes the percental number of relevant search results within the total number of results generated. Focusing on the analysis based on the criteria “medium precision” (which includes all judgements of one or two on a scale from one to six, one being most relevant), it turns out that Google comes off best with a Precision of 46 Percent (cf. Figure 1). Google was able to deliver 15% more relevant search results than MSN. If one compares algorithm-based search engines to social bookmarking services and answer-/question-services, the latter are able to generate a higher degree of relevant results. Within this group, the performance of Lycos IQ is better than the performance of Yahoo! Clever. The worst results are generated by social bookmarking systems, which can provide less than half of the amount of relevant hits than Google. This can be lead back to the immense number of defect links and obvious problems with maintaining the indexes up to date. Furthermore, especially del.icio.us reveals a lot of links to pages in foreign languages which may be relevant, but cannot be understood. But it has to be stressed, that even the first ten results of the “top performer” Google deliver at least 5 results which are not significantly relevant, so that the results cannot be regarded as satisfying in the end.

Figure 1: Precision of search results

Regarding the intelligibility of search results, 84% of the hits within the sample are understandable. Bookmarking systems provide the highest amount of results which cannot be understood. In this case it is especially noticeable that the judges estimated 25 percent of all results generated by del.icio.us as not intelligible (cf. Figure 2). All other search engines provide a relatively low amount of results which can be understood.

Figure 2: Intelligibility of search results

Furthermore it was tested, in how far the search results can be taken as trustworthy. Here, too, Google & Co fare better than social bookmarking systems (cf. Figure 3). Question-/Answer-Services have not been included in this analysis, as the criteria needed have not been prompted.
Only 40 percent of the results of social bookmarking systems are judged on as trustworthy. This differs from the results expected in advance, as the content and the links provided are exclusively chosen by users. Another phenomenon regarding the trustworthiness is that Wikipedia-pages are regarded as very trustworthy in spite of just containing user generated content. Overall, 5% of the hits in the sample provide Wikipedia-links, 63 percent of which are regarded as trustworthy.

Abb. 3: Trustworthiness of search results

The results, which are only sketched in this place, reveal that social search services can not compete with algorithm-based search engines at the current point of time. But it has to be added that social bookmarking systems have been designed for private link collection, not as search engine. But what is more important: There are a lot of activities and projects that are on a good way to establish alternatives to global players like Google, Yahoo and MSN.