Faceting search engine Eccellio in under 2 minutes.

June 15th, 2009 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Innovations, Newcomers | No Comments »


Click here to try out Eccellio for yourself.

Hope reviews ScienceResearch (AltSearchEngines’ post #3,000)

June 15th, 2009 by Hope Leman
Posted in Newcomers, Reviews, Verticals | 1 Comment »

leman012
By Hope Leman

This morning I am taking a test drive in the new user interface of ScienceResearch.com. This search engine has been around since 2005. But I am treating it as brand new in this post, given that I have not written about it before and given its new look. 

2009-06-15_1743The first thing I did was try out the home page search function. Nice and handsome. I tried out my usual search term, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. I decided not to go immediately to the Advanced Search page where I did have the option of limiting my search using a wide range of limiters (such is the amusingly oxymoronic jargon of search!): date, health and science, etc. Everyone interested in science search and attractive, user-friendly Web design should take a look at that page. 

Budding inventors and science journalists and laypeople just curious about what has been written lately on certain scientific subjects should try out the “Patent news” and “Science News” options. Some of the results for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis I got using the Science News options were a little bit on the only slightly related side. But I did get a link to this fascinating article, “Social Networking Sites Embrace Clinical Trials” here which I would not have otherwise seen and it is a mark of a good search engine that it apprises users of treasures so far undiscovered by them. For those laypeople seeking to understand a newly diagnosed condition, the Science News feature of ScienceResearch.com is a nice complement to other sources of medical information such as MedlinePlus.

 For instance, sometimes a simple news story in a local paper can often illustrate what certain conditions entail for patients. Here, for example, is a profile of a very courageous couple coping with ALS: Learning to cope with ALS 

The article contains useful information such as this, “…DynaVox computer system. The system looks like a flat panel television, but has an infrared camera that tracks the movement of Ann’s eyes. Ann is training her eye muscles to “push” buttons on the computer screen, which she can then use to type out messages, email and signal for help. She will also be able to control the television, wireless Internet and telephone with the blink of an eye. 

There were a couple of upgrades the couple added to the system and it can even synthesize a voice for Ann, all through the use of her eye power.”  

Thank you Ann and Howard Hanson for sharing your story. It is really heartening while trying out a search engine to stop and read about loving couples facing adversity courageously. And that is what good search engines like ScienceResearch.com do—they enable users to read about health technologies in real-world situations and make note of specific product names. 

Back on the home page. I tried out the “preferences” button, which enabled me to get 250 items per page—that was nice. The more items on a page, the better as having to click for a new page after only a few results is a bother. 

One definite major plus of ScienceResearch.com, is that it returns recent results of abstracts (though not the article themselves, usually) for Elsevier’s Science Direct such as the article, Managing patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis here.

I just did a search for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in PubMed and that article was not in PubMed yet. So way to go both ScienceResearch.com and Elsevier for rendering the latter’s outstanding content more readily discoverable. It will be interesting to see how Elsevier works with innovative search companies such as Deep Web Technologies (the firm behind ScienceResearch.com), DeepDyve and NextBio—see here  in alerting the research community and an increasingly savvy and search-powered (thanks to these innovative companies) lay public to its articles. Elsevier finally is getting search. Yay! Go, Elsevier, go! Take advantage of the know-how of these search firms. You have the world’s best content—showcase it. 

One thing I found a little confusing in ScienceResearch.com was that sometimes it linked directly to the abstract at the site of the publisher and sometimes to the abstract in PubMed. Although it is useful to be taken to PubMed (as one can make a can save items to its clipboard), I wasn’t quite clear on why I was taken to PubMed in some cases with some of the Springer journals and at other times to the site of the journal at Springer itself. I did like, though, that one of the limiters was Springer. But not, interestingly, ScienceDirect or MD Consult. 

Still, there is a lot to like about ScienceResearch.com and its new look is worth a look. It will be interesting to see what those in hardcore science like mathematics and chemistry think of it.

New to us – The wine discovery engine Adegga

June 15th, 2009 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Newcomers, Verticals | 1 Comment »

ad1Adegga is a Social Wine Discovery service. The idea is to take the complexity out of wine and allow people to discover wines based on other people’s choice. Adegga also helps you organize your wines. You can keep track of wines you taste, make a wish list or organize your home cellar.

Adegga lets you build a personalized watch list so that you can keep track of what people on your list are choosing and tasting. You can add friends, wine bloggers, producers and just about anyone else. You can also add wine producers and wine shops to your personalized watch list so that you keep track of when a producer releases a new wine or a wine shop makes a promotion.

Here’s a short list of situations where you can use Adegga.

mobile_user_accountsKeep track of wines in your cellar.
See which wines you’ve tasted to check if you have tried it before.
Check your wish list before your next visit to the wine shop.
Read what people you trust think about a specific wine.
Check if someone you trust has a specific bottle of wine.
Lookup up prices for a wine you’re thinking of buying.
Review that amazing wine shop you’ve just bought wine from.
See what promotions your favourite wine shop is running this week.
Read what wine bloggers are saying about a wine (soon).

There’s more that you can do on Adegga and there’s more that we want you to be able to do. Source: Adegga

Microsoft to practice Safe Sex with new Bing domain.

June 15th, 2009 by Guest Author
Posted in Guest Authors, Majors, Updates | 2 Comments »

Dear readers,

You may have read our (Bing) post last week where we talked about how Smart Motion Preview and SafeSearch work together.

As we mentioned, Microsoft is never done when it comes to providing tools to help customers, whether they are large enterprises, local school districts or parents make sure they can provide a safe searching experience when using Bing.

We made two changes that we think will help.

185First, potentially explicit images and video content will now be coming from a separate domain, explicit.bing.net.  This is invisible to the end customer, but allows for filtering of that content by domain which makes it much easier for customers at all levels to block this content regardless of what the SafeSearch settings might be.  This makes it much easier for filtering software to block unwanted content if SafeSearch has been turned off.

In addition, we will begin returning source url information in the query string for images and video content so that companies who already use this method of filtering will be able to catch explicit content on Bing along with everything else they are already blocking for their customers. 

Thank you to everyone who shared feedback with us on this matter, it helped us to quickly develop a solution and get it into production.

Mike Nichols,
General Manager, Bing

A true decision engine, Hunch wants to learn about you.

June 15th, 2009 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Innovations, Newcomers | No Comments »

h1
Look. Decision-making is difficult, and decisions have to be made constantly.
What should I be for Halloween? Do I need a Porsche? Should I dump that loser? Is Phoenix a good place to retire? Whom should I vote for? What toe ring should I buy?

It’s a cruel world out there. Coin-flipping, I Ching consultation, closing your eyes and jumping, postponing the inevitable, Rock-Paper-Scissors, and asking your sister are all time-honored means of coming to a decision — and yet we think there’s room for one more: Hunch.

In 10 questions or less, Hunch will offer you a great solution to your problem, concern or dilemma, on hundreds of topics. Hunch’s answers are based on the collective knowledge of the entire Hunch community, narrowed down to people like you, or just enough like you that you might be mistaken for each other in a dark room. Hunch is designed so that every time it’s used, it learns something new. That means Hunch’s hunches are always getting better.

Hunch was started by clever folks who were exploring how machine learning could be used to guide practical decision-making.

We think that you will love Hunch. It may not be awesome yet — a lot of people have to contribute to it before it knows much of anything. But it will be awesome later. Love it anyway. Love it now.

h21

For a normal person’s overview of what Hunch is, see our about page. But if, like many of us, you’re the type of person who likes to watch those “how it works” shows, here’s a little more detail that might appeal to your inner geek.

Researchers have documented how decisions made by diverse and independent groups of people are often superior to those made by individuals – even experts. The reason is that knowledge is often spread among many people. The challenge is to identify it, collect it, and effectively use it.

Take, for example, expertise about colleges or cars. In a random, large group of people, most probably know something about a few examples (say, the college someone attended or the car they currently drive) but are not experts on the topic as a whole (as a college guidance counselor or auto executive might be). If you were able to collect and organize all the various bits of individual knowledge that the large group possesses, you’d have a pretty complete picture of the topic overall.

At the core of Hunch is a question selection algorithm built by our small gaggle of MIT computer scientists with backgrounds in machine learning. The algorithm is always asking itself, “What can I ask you next which will lead to the best possible result for this decision?” The choice of which questions to ask and when to ask them will vary based on what you’ve already been asked (and how you’ve answered) so far, the same way that a human expert would adjust a line of questioning based on your responses. The idea is that if someone says they’re a vegetarian, you don’t want to then immediately ask them how they want their steak cooked.

In choosing what to ask you, Hunch’s question selection algorithm tries to do two things. First, it tries to find a question which will discriminate well among the remaining possible decision outcomes for you – thus filtering the remaining choices from “many” to “fewer”. Second, the algorithm looks for a question which can help optimize and rank the remaining decision results to present you with the ones you’ll like the most. It’s trying to ensure that you’ll like outcome #1 better than outcome #5.

As you answer questions, Hunch can narrow down your possible decision outcomes because each outcome can be “trained” to correspond with each question’s answers. Any logged in user can set initial training or correct existing training, in addition to proposing new topics, questions to ask, and decision outcomes. This is how Hunch is truly a collection of common knowledge. So whether you happen to know a great question that would lead someone to a Sancerre vs. a Pinot Grigio, or you’d like to clarify that “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane” is probably more of a “campy” than a “cult” movie, Hunch absorbs your input and uses it to provide smarter decision results for the next user.

Besides users explicitly training and contributing to Hunch, there’s a second way that Hunch learns, especially for what we call ‘Teach Hunch About You’ questions which have more to do with you as a person than with your preferences for a specific topic’s objective decision criteria. When a user clicks “Yes” or “No” to indicate whether or not they like a decision result, Hunch incrementally strengthens or weakens the mathematical correlation between that result and any ‘Teach Hunch About You’ questions that have been answered so far. So over time, Hunch might learn that people living in cities tend to prefer diet sodas, or that SCUBA divers tend to like bicycles with lots of gears. (we just made those examples ups, but you get the idea.) The academic name for this sort of algorithm is machine learning.

So, like we said…
Hunch is designed to soak up collective knowledge and then organize it in a useful way to help you make smart decisions. Hunch proposes custom decision results for you that it wouldn’t necessarily give to somebody else. But at its core, Hunch’s decision making algorithm is just a mathematical framework. It’s the users of Hunch who give the algorithm proper training and personality by contributing to it and making it clever, funny, and nuanced…. but most of all very useful in helping everyone to make smart, efficient decisions.

Source: Hunch.com