<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should LinkedIn buy Twellow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altsearchengines.com/2008/10/02/should-linkedin-buy-twellow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altsearchengines.com/2008/10/02/should-linkedin-buy-twellow/</link>
	<description>The most wonderful search engines you've never seen!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:10:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.altsearchengines.com/2008/10/02/should-linkedin-buy-twellow/comment-page-1/#comment-100754</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altsearchengines.com/2008/10/02/should-linkedin-buy-twellow/#comment-100754</guid>
		<description>Great post with interesting views, Keren.

I feel if anything it would be better the other way round (although I doubt Twellow has the funds, but who knows).

LinkedIn started out with wonderful plans to help businesses connect with each other and expand their brand, but it&#039;s failed miserably at that. Instead, as you say, it&#039;s more just a glorified address book (although it even fails on this with businesses lacking updates even though you know there&#039;s been changes).

LinkedIn has also failed spectacularly at adapting to Web 2.0 and social media trends, and in this day and age that&#039;s a huge no-no for any business site that wishes to be taken seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post with interesting views, Keren.</p>
<p>I feel if anything it would be better the other way round (although I doubt Twellow has the funds, but who knows).</p>
<p>LinkedIn started out with wonderful plans to help businesses connect with each other and expand their brand, but it&#8217;s failed miserably at that. Instead, as you say, it&#8217;s more just a glorified address book (although it even fails on this with businesses lacking updates even though you know there&#8217;s been changes).</p>
<p>LinkedIn has also failed spectacularly at adapting to Web 2.0 and social media trends, and in this day and age that&#8217;s a huge no-no for any business site that wishes to be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
