Social Activism: A New Online Movement

January 14th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Guest Authors | 1 Comment »

By Drew Rayman, Founder of Attendi
 
The proliferation of social networks, specialized search engines and online communities has led to greater collaboration and personal empowerment. The development of these Web 2.0 platforms has created a way to bring together the collective intelligence of people who share similar interests, finally giving everyone a forum to interact and share ideas and insights. The Internet is flexing it muscle as a social tool and the millions of people who “speak-up” are creating a new movement called “Social Activism.”

Social Activism is built on the human element of conversation, allowing everyone to be found and interact in a public forum using a blend of search, social networking and chat. The foundation of online activism is based on the concept of public discourse, where we reach out beyond our private social networks to share our insights and embark upon public conversations with multiple people around the globe who share similar interests. The goal: to build an ongoing, social medium for generating and archiving a data-bank of wisdom, and making it searchable for others online.

There has been a great deal of time and effort spent ­ successfully in managing the enormous amount of content on the Internet.  Traditional search vendors are really just engines for managing the wealth of information currently online ­ some 20 billion web pages and growing. There is so much data in fact, that new search companies have surfaced that enlist the help of people “guides” to help navigate these vast oceans of data. These applications add the human element, hoping to make better sense of it all: better suggestions, better links and better bookmarks.

Engage in Conversation
But what search engines lack is the power of conversation. The best way for people to share knowledge is public discourse.  Conversation takes us back to one of the basic human traits of communicating talk. If I want to know what you know, ideally I can simply ask you.  Discussion is the driver for much of what we, as individuals, know.

Plus, the cadence, the ebb and flow of conversation takes us closer to the single bit of information we are seeking ­ faster and better than searching. For many, conversation is the preferred form of communication because it allows for the free-flow exchange of ideas for people with different perspectives on a subject. By engaging in conversation, you’re raising your hand, joining other passionate, opinionated, knowledgeable people, sharing experience and insight in a live, dynamic and engaging community. What’s even more important is that this valuable information can be indexed and searchable for the benefit of others.

Imagine seeking information about a type of cancer. Of course you could find plenty of information across various sites on the Internet, but wouldn¹t it be more valuable to talk to an actual patient, someone who has lived through the process and the treatment? Discussion will get you more enlightened information, opinion and commentary. Now imagine that commentary being added to a public database of information, making it searchable for the benefit of everyone in that online community. Doesn’t this get us closer to the true ideals of a semantic web application, through a blend of search and social networking?
 
The democratization of the Internet is resulting in the creation of different forums to share our most valuable commodity ­ human intellect and knowledge. This concept of sharing our experiences through public discourse makes the Internet more conducive to commmunity action and making information more accessible and communal than ever before.
 
The Center for the Digital Future at the USC Annenberg School conducts research each year related to how online technology affects the lives of Internet users. The 2007 Digital Future Project found that Internet use is growing and evolving as an instrument for personal engagement through blogs, personal Web sites, and online communities. According to this study, 43.7 percent of online community members got involved more in social causes since they started participating in online communities.
 
“More than a decade after the portals of the Worldwide Web opened to  the public, we are now witnessing the true emergence of the Internet  as the powerful personal and social phenomenon we knew it would become,” said Jeffrey I. Cole, director of the USC Annenberg School  Center for the Digital Future.
 
 While Web 2.0 applications facilitate the collaboration that takes  place in online communities, what happens to this information when the  conversations stop? To truly empower social activism, we need to find  a way to capture the insights and knowledge contained in these conversations, for the benefit of other members who can use the information. Then, by making this information searchable, we all  become part of a global community of information activists.
 
Drew Rayman is Founder of Attendi, a blend of search and social networking that empowers its users to share knowledge through open, public discourse. An Internet entrepreneur, Rayman also serves as the Founder and Advisor of i33 communications, an interactive advertising agency based in New York City.

Web Allusive Relation Map | Social Search Engine

January 14th, 2008 by Charles S. Knight
Posted in Alts, Global, Guest Authors, Reviews | No Comments »

Guest Post by Mr. Wednesday


 WARM = The Web Allusive Relation Map.

WARM = The Interpersonal Relations on the Web

Blogs are so popular in Taiwan these years. Someone who doesn’t blog is just like he that does not have a name. Blogs have become the common way to know people and to be known by others. Many blog service providers (BSP) provide the friend list feature; in other words, users can set other user as his/her “friend”. Obviously, many direct or indirect relationship links form complicated social network on the Web. We all have a desire to know the map of relationships. Therefore, social network search engines are coming to fulfill this demands.

WARM is directed by Dr. Wu (CSIE of Shu-Te University) and the core team includes CSIE students, 許無寒, 許迺赫, 李紀廣 and 管世達. The whole project was completed in 2007. Originally it was just a research project on campus; then it suddenly became so popular in Taiwan.

Functions Review:

WARM can search the following social networks: Wretch, Yam Blog, Xuite and Pixnet. (Wretch is the biggest one in Taiwan and it dominates 70% of the market share.) According to the homepage of WARM, it provides the following functions: (1) Who set me as a friend, (2) relationship searching, (3) celebrity ranking, (4) co-cited friend, (5) similar friends and (6) friendship groups. The following tests are focused on Wretch and the account, “ksbcboy”, is used to do the experiment.

1. Who Set Me As A Friend
The so-called friendship is just a directed edge in graph; in other words, people can decide whom to be their friend but they cannot decide who will set them as friend. This function is for finding back links of friendships. In other words, find out who set me as his/her friend.

2. Relationship Searching
Stanley Milgram is a social psychologist at Harvard University. In 1976, he began a widely-publicized set of experiments to investigate the so-called “small world problem”. The six degrees of separation concept originates from this experiment. It means any two persons on earth can be connected through a chain of acquaintances that has 6 intermediaries in average.

(from: Wikipedia)

This function of WARM is to find the distance between two persons. To find out through how many persons can two unfamiliar persons be connected.

3. Celebrity Ranking
Finding out the so-called celebrity (You know him/her but he/she doesn’t know you) according to how many times he/she is set as friend by others.

Mr. Wednesday noticed that the user can give comments to the other user. It can help others to know this person; however, there are some emotional comments (not good words…) and Mr. Wednesday thinks that this function is not practical.

4. Co-cited Friends
Based on people who set someone as friend, find out whom these people also set as friend. In other words, find out who is usually set as a friend with you. Take the following result for example, there are 4 people (25%) who set “ksbcboy” as friend also set “ruo616″ as friend.

5. Similar Friends
Find out someone who has similar friends. In other words, find out who has similar social contacts as you. Take the following result for example, among “ksbcboy’s” friends, there are 10 persons same with “utechkimo’s” that occupies 32% of “uetechkimo’s” all friends.

6. Friendship Groups
Find some groups in which people know each other.

UI/Usability Review:

WARM regards itself as a social network search engine currently. All functions begin from a query and end in a search result. In terms of searching, the presentation of search results is compact and it is easy to use. However, the search results are lack of further explanation and applications. The practical utility is still not enough.

During the testing, the response time of server is short but sometimes the searching is freezing till timeout. This is really harmful for services on the Web.

Similar Services:

There are some similar social network search engine. They search the whole Web and analyze the search results to organize the information of persons, such as PeekYou , Pipl, Spock, ucloo, WikiYou, Wink and Zoominfo, etc. Among them, Spock got 7 million USD ffom VC last year even though it was not open at that time.

Besides, there are more and more social networks on Web, such as Facebook, Friendster, LinkedIn, MySpace, orkut, Yahoo! 360, wallop and Xiaonei, etc. The information on these websites are provided by users while registering or using. There is a standalone social network in each website so the searching is limited in individual websites. The standpoint of WARM is different from them.

Profitability:

WARM is free for use currently.

Conclusion:

The source of information for WARM comes from the blog service providers and it’s not easy to collect the data. There is no business model and profitability. It’s still focused on interests and academic research. In conclusion, WARM is a surprising service but it’s not good enough to earn profits.

By this kind of social network search engine, the interpersonal relationships between people seem to become “clear”; However, the innominate nature of Web is broken. Everything you want others to know or not could be discovered. A few months ago, there was a news itm in Taiwan, it read: A Girl uses WARM to discover her boyfriend two-timing. Suddenly, WARM became a tool to test a lover’s loyalty, whether this function is imagined by the WARM team in the beginning or not. Mr. Wednesday thinks that everyone doesn’t want his/her personal information open on the Web but the desire of peeking is always popular. This is a conflict situation, however, it may be a corner for social network search engine to live.

Although the Web facilitates people to extend their friendships, does it makes people better able to get along with more friends? While the cost of making friends lowers, does it lower the value of friendships? Maybe the Web is the mirror of the real world and people on the Web are still getting used to the groups which they are familiar with in the real world.

Related Readings: (Chinese)

To see in it’s original language, click here.