<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case of The Jilted Jam!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/</link>
	<description>The most wonderful search engines you've never seen!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alt Search Engines &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Future of Search: Do the Math.</title>
		<link>http://www.altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/comment-page-1/#comment-22931</link>
		<dc:creator>Alt Search Engines &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Future of Search: Do the Math.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/#comment-22931</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem, Charles argues, is that there are too many independent Alternative Search Engines.  Reference: this post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem, Charles argues, is that there are too many independent Alternative Search Engines.  Reference: this post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.vortexdna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Your visionary Internet vision</title>
		<link>http://www.altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/comment-page-1/#comment-11543</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.vortexdna.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Your visionary Internet vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/#comment-11543</guid>
		<description>[...] create anything we choose to&#8212;as long as we refuse to accept anything less. We can create a Unifying Interface that allows us to access the brilliance of 1,000 alternative search engines. We can create [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] create anything we choose to&mdash;as long as we refuse to accept anything less. We can create a Unifying Interface that allows us to access the brilliance of 1,000 alternative search engines. We can create [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaz</title>
		<link>http://www.altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>kaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Charles:

I enjoyed the Sherlock Holmes theme very much and it was a very good change up.

I had to read it three times before everything came together and I wonder if that is due to me becoming a feed junkie.

Anyways, I agree with the general argument that 98% of the search audience prefer the six choices while only 2% go beyond the six choices.

I somewhat agree with the part of about how the 98% percent prefer the six jam selection because of simplicity. I think it goes a little more beyond that.

I wrote small article for submission a while back in regards to the potential of AOL and Ask.com merging to become a better company and certain factors working in their advantage

The foundation of the article was about how the pure search model would gradually becoming extinct and to become a major competitor, search companies would have to adopt services too. So in essence, Search &#38; Service would be the new model going forward.

I think the same applies here somewhat where that the continued success of Google, Yahoo, MSN, and AOL has a good deal to do with its services too. Everything from Email, Instant Message, Storage, Calendars, etc.

So in other words, the six jams are preferred more because they offer more than just search and simplicity.

I hope that makes sense, did I mention I enjoyed the Sherlock Holmes theme, lol, peace...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles:</p>
<p>I enjoyed the Sherlock Holmes theme very much and it was a very good change up.</p>
<p>I had to read it three times before everything came together and I wonder if that is due to me becoming a feed junkie.</p>
<p>Anyways, I agree with the general argument that 98% of the search audience prefer the six choices while only 2% go beyond the six choices.</p>
<p>I somewhat agree with the part of about how the 98% percent prefer the six jam selection because of simplicity. I think it goes a little more beyond that.</p>
<p>I wrote small article for submission a while back in regards to the potential of AOL and Ask.com merging to become a better company and certain factors working in their advantage</p>
<p>The foundation of the article was about how the pure search model would gradually becoming extinct and to become a major competitor, search companies would have to adopt services too. So in essence, Search &amp; Service would be the new model going forward.</p>
<p>I think the same applies here somewhat where that the continued success of Google, Yahoo, MSN, and AOL has a good deal to do with its services too. Everything from Email, Instant Message, Storage, Calendars, etc.</p>
<p>So in other words, the six jams are preferred more because they offer more than just search and simplicity.</p>
<p>I hope that makes sense, did I mention I enjoyed the Sherlock Holmes theme, lol, peace&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Yahoo - The Case of The Jilted Jam!</title>
		<link>http://www.altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Yahoo - The Case of The Jilted Jam!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altsearchengines.com/2007/07/22/the-case-of-the-jilted-jam/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>[...]                       Link to Article                yahoo The Case of The Jilted Jam! &#187;  Posted at Alt Search Engines  on Sunday, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]                       Link to Article                yahoo The Case of The Jilted Jam! &#187;  Posted at Alt Search Engines  on Sunday, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
